<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No more Google Local Business Results for SEO Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/google-local-business-results-for-seo-companies/339/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/google-local-business-results-for-seo-companies/339/</link>
	<description>The World of Search Engine Optimisation and Internet Marketing, join in and post a comment!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Hadaway</title>
		<link>http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/google-local-business-results-for-seo-companies/339/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Hadaway</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=339#comment-207</guid>
		<description>I was effected by the change, but I can also understand the change, I just wish they would explain it better.

To me, it seems obvious. It&#039;s not just Web Design / SEO companies that have been removed from local business results, but virtually every web-based company.

Why? It seems very clear to me; because anything web-based or services that can be provided remotely over the internet are technically available worldwide and have no local relevance.

So again, although it has hurt me as a Web &amp; Graphic Designer where I see less potential clients finding me locally that ultimately would have lead to an in-person meeting and landing the project; I understand Google&#039;s decision.

Too many people can abuse the local directory by stuffing locational keywords and the bottom line is they have just decided to give precedence to actual brick and mortar store fronts and filter out all the rest.

I just wish I would/could read more clear and concise explanations like that from the horses mouth.

Thanks, Bryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was effected by the change, but I can also understand the change, I just wish they would explain it better.</p>
<p>To me, it seems obvious. It&#8217;s not just Web Design / SEO companies that have been removed from local business results, but virtually every web-based company.</p>
<p>Why? It seems very clear to me; because anything web-based or services that can be provided remotely over the internet are technically available worldwide and have no local relevance.</p>
<p>So again, although it has hurt me as a Web &amp; Graphic Designer where I see less potential clients finding me locally that ultimately would have lead to an in-person meeting and landing the project; I understand Google&#8217;s decision.</p>
<p>Too many people can abuse the local directory by stuffing locational keywords and the bottom line is they have just decided to give precedence to actual brick and mortar store fronts and filter out all the rest.</p>
<p>I just wish I would/could read more clear and concise explanations like that from the horses mouth.</p>
<p>Thanks, Bryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monica Chia</title>
		<link>http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/google-local-business-results-for-seo-companies/339/comment-page-1/#comment-141</link>
		<dc:creator>Monica Chia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=339#comment-141</guid>
		<description>I agree - this move seems to be targeted only at SEO related, web design &amp; web hosting companies. Perhaps as a &quot;penalty&quot; for these sorts of companies attempting to dominate and crowd SERPs for such competitive local keywords?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; this move seems to be targeted only at SEO related, web design &#038; web hosting companies. Perhaps as a &#8220;penalty&#8221; for these sorts of companies attempting to dominate and crowd SERPs for such competitive local keywords?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Morris</title>
		<link>http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/google-local-business-results-for-seo-companies/339/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blueclaw.co.uk/seo-blog/?p=339#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Personally I don&#039;t see the reason behind the user intent argument. If this was the case then other industries that are not dependent on locality would be affected such as mortgages and from this example they are not.
http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&amp;site=&amp;q=mortgages+sheffield&amp;btnG=Search&amp;meta=</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I don&#8217;t see the reason behind the user intent argument. If this was the case then other industries that are not dependent on locality would be affected such as mortgages and from this example they are not.<br />
<a href="http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&#038;site=&#038;q=mortgages+sheffield&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.co.uk/search?hl=en&#038;site=&#038;q=mortgages+sheffield&#038;btnG=Search&#038;meta</a>=</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

