Published: October 27th, 2009
I’ve recently read that Youtube is now the second most-used search engine, ahead of Yahoo and Bing. If it is, then what does it mean for the long-discussed future of vertical search?
In case you don’t know what vertical search is, it means niche search engines that focus on a particular area of search. For example, you go to Youtube to search for videos only. So far, many have predicted that vertical search will take over from the current search paradigm, as vertical search can provide better results for the user - by better fulfilling their search expectations.
Google has noticed this coming and has diversified its product line to accommodate – e.g. Google Product Search, which focuses on…product search. So far this has proved successful in staving off the apparently imminent migration to niche corners of the internet.
Published: October 23rd, 2009
This is a question I often ask myself. As far as I can see, the answer seems to depend upon two factors – the emergence of real time search and how SEO progresses within the marketing mix.
At present it is impossible to see beyond Google when looking into the future. However, the emergence of a viable competitor does not seem as far off as it did a year ago. The merger of the Bing and Yahoo could make an impact – as long as they stop trying to play catch-up and start looking beyond existing search conventions.
One avenue that looks like it could impact upon Google’s quality-weighted algorithm is real-time search. At the moment, real-time search doesn’t offer much in terms of value for businesses. This is because of its current prominence in the social media sector. The failure of businesses to convert social media into revenue means that the connection between real-time search and revenue has not really been made.
Published: October 20th, 2009
We have updated our popular Twitter Tool to include ‘negative keywords’ and ‘filter by Twitter username’ options - Tweetseek is a completely free Twitter widget that grabs the latest results from Twitter based on your keywords. You can use TweetSeek on your website, blog or…whatever.

Published: October 12th, 2009
In order for SEO to become a fully integrated part of the marketing mix, it must pay more attention to how it fits itself in with overall marketing strategy.
A main element that is currently neglected by SEO is brand.
SEO can no longer simply be about achieving brand awareness, as the methods it uses to achieve brand awareness encompass a far broader spectrum of brand components. Does our SEO strategy fit in with the brand values – is it fun, forward thinking or environmental, for example? What about our interaction with others? And which links will support the brand image?
At present, these questions are ignored by many in the SEO community, but it could be the missing piece in the jigsaw. Thinking about these questions will allow you to work with bigger brands – brands that have developed beyond a mere logo and into a philosophy. A philosophy that you must become part of…or at the very least, compromise with!
It may blur the lines between SEO and other marketing functions, but Google dictates this must be so in order to be successful in the rankings. Buying or reciprocating links will not work for the bigger clients with the popular keywords.
As such, marketing is beginning to realise that SEO is no longer the little brother that can survive off pocket money – it has grown up and must be invited to the party. But to make sure it’s invited back, it must behave appropriately! And this means paying attention to the needs of the brand it’s working with.
Published: October 12th, 2009
This issue has been discussed a million times on various blogs around the web, what is wrong with UK results?
The latest results I take a bitter dislike to today is for ‘books’. 1st, 2nd and 4th position are taken by Google with their .com .co.uk and .com.br and Amazon in 3rd, as well as adding news results and locations. I have been under the impression that Google were all for making the whole process easy and wanted to display the best results as quickly as possible.

So not only are they taking up the results with their own results, which I’m sure are not earnt like the rest of us have to earn them, but they add in their News and Location results as well which I don’t normally mind, making any relevant result at the bottom of the page and even demoted to the second page therefore going against their own ethos.
I don’t imagine for one second that this has anything to do with the dispute between Google and Amazon and I’m sure surrounding the Amazon result is purely a coincident due to the well documented results problem.
I know Google are a business and all businesses have to make money to survive, but come on this is just taking advantage and monopolising a very popular search term.
We have all seen the dubious international results being returned in UK search results but this is just going a bit too far, come on Google, try and fix the issue.