Author Archive

Link baiting and your brand

There is some confusion about what link baiting is, how to go about it and what relationship it should have with your brand.

Link baiting is the creation of something that attracts links from others. Your creation can be interesting, humorous or shocking. As long as it gets people talking, referring and linking then it’s fulfilling its purpose.

It can be an article, blog or video. Or a game. Really, just anything that gets discussion going and makes people want to show others.

How to prevent content theft

Have you ever stumbled across a website that has ripped off the copy you poured hours of sweat and tears into writing? What can you do about it?

Some webmasters employ javascript alerts (‘Don’t even think about it!’) to put off sneaky thieves from copying anything on the page, and others don’t allow users to right-click at all. They are right to not take the issue lightly – duplicate content will not help your SEO efforts.

However, there are other tactics you can employ, which allow users to retain their freedom to click and copy what they like, whilst still giving you the ability to give content thieves a cheeky kick in the crotch.

When and where to redirect?

This week has raised some questions regarding when to use 301 redirects and where users should be redirected if a user comes across an error page (a 404 page).

Sheffield Floods and SEO: a strange combination

Yesterday was a strange day. It all started when I received a text with a simple statement: ‘Sheffield’s flooded’. Not something you want to hear when you’re heading home there in an hour. However, I dismissed it. Surely the ramblings of an over-dramatic girlfriend?

It wasn’t – you may have seen it on the news. Well, I got on my train, sat and waited to be taken under water to the place I call home. Except it didn’t happen, as everyone suddenly remembered trains aren’t supposed to go under water and hence it was cancelled. We were then told that local trains were still running. Marvelling at the sudden transformer-like ability of local trains to turn into boats, I headed over to the platform, where I met an American who was trying to get to Sheffield for some university-related event. We got on the train and headed towards Waterworld, talking about our jobs to pass the time.

It’s amazing what you can pick up simply by talking to someone with a different role in life. The American, a university lecturer, explained to me about some issues they were having with the University website. Apparently they had recently re-launched their business school but, they were having problems with their results in search engines for targeted search terms. The previous incarnation of the business school had closed down in 1999, but the news story reporting the closure appears top of the current search results for their targeted search terms. Therefore, people were searching for the well-publicised school, stumbling upon this news story and ringing up to ask why the school had closed already.

The moral to this story: always keep tabs on your old pages. Some SEO’s prefer to keep old content in the directory – an indexed page with old content that could still lead to a valued visitor is better than a valued visitor lost. However, as demonstrated by my American flood-victim, sometimes old content is more trouble than it’s worth.

We made it to Sheffield and lived to spread this wisdom.

Will Google buy Twitter?

A question that everyone wants to know the answer to: will search engine giant Google buy Twitter?

Some argue that even if the deal doesn’t happen, Google should take a leaf out of Twitter’s book. Twitter’s micro-blogging site allows real-time updates and search, taking advantage of the fact that users are becoming increasingly expectant that online news and information be updated in real-time.

Though Eric Schmidt, Google’s chief executive, argued to the contrary, Twitter may have exposed the fact that in some cases speed is valued more highly than quality.

How does Google deal with this? Well the simple answer is: perhaps it should find some way to list some of its results by speed. New stories could be listed in order of who got there first. Or by which was the last to be updated. This of course throws up lots of difficulties, but Google should probably accept that in some cases speed could one day be king and find a way to accommodate it. They could just by add an extra option that allows users to rank results by speed instead of quality, or even by other factors.

Apparently Google is busy working away on its new tool, Google Squared, which returns results in columns of writing, pictures, videos, adding ‘structured integration’ to the web. This could have huge implications for search, but quality will probably still be the main ranking tool of choice. Let’s see if they remember speed in the future.

Page 8 of 8« First...«2345678