Published: August 10th, 2009
Bing has dropped the whole of one my websites over the weekend. The only change I’ve made to it in the last week is to put more copy on a few of the pages (incidentally Google has liked this, with a positive effect on rankings). So why has Bing dropped the whole site out of the top 500 results for all key terms in the past 3 days?
Maybe it’s some kind of backlash to the accusations of the algorithm being domain-name heavy i.e. domain name has a big effect on rankings in Bing. The domain name for my site was aimed at the main key phrase and was ranking quite well in Bing, possibly as a consequence. But no more.
Whatever it is, they best sort it out. If it’s some kind of strange tactic to shift people’s attention onto focusing their SEO efforts on getting into Bing and deflecting attention from Google then it isn’t going to work. I, for one, will just ignore them until I have any evidence that their merger with Yahoo comes to anything worthwhile in terms of market share.
Anyone else had strange goings-on with Bing and do you actually care?
Published: August 6th, 2009
Coming to SEO from a marketing background, I immediately noticed conflict between SEO and branding.
When building a brand, a positioning statement is usually drawn up outlining its values and core message. Words are used very carefully in order to portray what exactly it is that the brand stands for. This message is then spread to the world using different marketing channels, such as the internet.
However, if SEO is important to your brand, then good marketing does not appear to equal success on the internet channel in terms of SEO. There are barriers prevent your precisely chosen message being spread across your site and throughout the internet. According to the principles of SEO this will mean there will be a plethora of duplicate content out there to negatively affect your rankings.
I believe there is a way around this though. Google thinks about these things and, using common sense, usually introduces answers to support its overall goal – to return the expected result (most relevant and highest quality). A high quality, popular site cannot help if identical content is spattered across the web. Therefore, Google determines which content is the original by comparing the amount of one way links.
My conclusion then is this: if you go out into the web and spread your message by only using reciprocal links to increase your rankings, then you’d better consider diluting/altering your carefully chosen words in order to avoid duplicate content penalties. If you really believe in the value of your brand message then have the confidence to resist simply relying on a link swapping strategy to get you up the rankings.
Published: July 31st, 2009
Content is king – that’s what they always say. But not many people offer a good explanation as to why - other than the flakey ‘because search engines like it’.
The explanation is simple really. Links determine the quality of your website. If you have lots of (one-way) links then a search engine will determine that you must have a high quality site. In Google, this will give you a high page rank. But content determines the relevancy. If you have loads of links but no content (copy) on your site then the search engine is unable to determine what your site is relevant to. So you will have a high page rank score with Google but you will be unlikely not appear high in the rankings for any of terms that you want.
So – your site needs content!
Published: July 29th, 2009
Bing and Yahoo are to announce a merger deal today, which will see Bing used to power Yahoo searches in the future. The deal has been discussed for some time as a new strategy to overtake Google, which presently holds a 63% share of worldwide searches.
The deal should see Yahoo as a new platform to deliver on Microsoft’s new search technology, such as delivering highly-targeted ads, following its currently unsuccessful launch of the Bing brand.
Published: July 24th, 2009
We have been involved with an interesting case recently with a retail site that hasn’t been ranking too well. Having conducted an investigation we concluded that the probable reason was because Google had been penalising the site for what looked to be an unnatural linking pattern.
This was because all of the links to the site’s pages contained the same word - an unnatural feature in Google’s eyes, according to our sources. However the site didn’t really have an unnatural link pattern at all – the nature of the site meant that it was hard to link to the site without mentioning that one word; especially since the domain name featured that word. So for example (i’m not going to use the actual website we worked on as I’m not sure I have permission) you have the domain www.multi-coloured-bottles.com and the site focuses on blue bottles, black bottles, green bottles, red bottles etc. How do you link to that site without mentioning the word bottles? Even just providing a standard link (without anchor text) still contains the word.