Archive for August, 2009

What is wrong with Bing?

Bing has dropped the whole of one my websites over the weekend. The only change I’ve made to it in the last week is to put more copy on a few of the pages (incidentally Google has liked this, with a positive effect on rankings). So why has Bing dropped the whole site out of the top 500 results for all key terms in the past 3 days?

Maybe it’s some kind of backlash to the accusations of the algorithm being domain-name heavy i.e. domain name has a big effect on rankings in Bing. The domain name for my site was aimed at the main key phrase and was ranking quite well in Bing, possibly as a consequence. But no more.

Whatever it is, they best sort it out. If it’s some kind of strange tactic to shift people’s attention onto focusing their SEO efforts on getting into Bing and deflecting attention from Google then it isn’t going to work. I, for one, will just ignore them until I have any evidence that their merger with Yahoo comes to anything worthwhile in terms of market share.

Anyone else had strange goings-on with Bing and do you actually care?

Twitter hit by denial of service attack

Twitter has been offline for the past few hours due to a denial of service attack.

The Conflict Between Brand and SEO

Coming to SEO from a marketing background, I immediately noticed conflict between SEO and branding.

When building a brand, a positioning statement is usually drawn up outlining its values and core message. Words are used very carefully in order to portray what exactly it is that the brand stands for. This message is then spread to the world using different marketing channels, such as the internet.

However, if SEO is important to your brand, then good marketing does not appear to equal success on the internet channel in terms of SEO. There are barriers prevent your precisely chosen message being spread across your site and throughout the internet. According to the principles of SEO this will mean there will be a plethora of duplicate content out there to negatively affect your rankings.

I believe there is a way around this though. Google thinks about these things and, using common sense, usually introduces answers to support its overall goal – to return the expected result (most relevant and highest quality). A high quality, popular site cannot help if identical content is spattered across the web. Therefore, Google determines which content is the original by comparing the amount of one way links.

My conclusion then is this: if you go out into the web and spread your message by only using reciprocal links to increase your rankings, then you’d better consider diluting/altering your carefully chosen words in order to avoid duplicate content penalties. If you really believe in the value of your brand message then have the confidence to resist simply relying on a link swapping strategy to get you up the rankings.